26

Five of the world’s largest oil and chemical companies—ExxonMobil, Dow, Shell, TotalEnergies, and ChevronPhillips—are under fire after a Greenpeace report revealed a massive disparity between their plastic production and recycling efforts. These companies, members of the Alliance to End Plastic Waste (AEPW), pledged in 2019 to tackle plastic pollution. However, Greenpeace’s analysis shows that they have produced over 1,000 times more plastic than they’ve helped divert from the environment.

AEPW’s Shortfall: Promises vs. Progress

The AEPW initially promised to divert 15 million tons of plastic waste by 2023 through improved waste management and recycling initiatives. Yet, Greenpeace found that over the past five years, these companies produced 132 million tons of plastic while diverting just 118,500 tons. This shortfall starkly contrasts with their stated goals, underscoring a significant gap between rhetoric and action.

Plastic Production vs. Recycling

Greenpeace’s analysis focused on polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), two of the most commonly produced plastics, used in packaging and everyday items. The findings revealed that while AEPW members diverted a fraction of plastic waste, their production vastly overshadowed these efforts. Excluding other plastics, such as polystyrene, suggests that the actual production-to-recycling disparity may be even greater.

The alliance quietly revised its 15-million-ton diversion target, reflecting limited progress and the challenges of meeting such an ambitious goal.

Criticism of Greenwashing Efforts

Greenpeace and other environmental groups have accused the AEPW of greenwashing its initiatives. Will McCallum of Greenpeace UK likened the alliance’s approach to “scooping up water with a teaspoon while leaving the tap running,” stressing the need for drastic reductions in plastic production.

Bill McKibben, a prominent environmentalist, criticized the oil and gas industry for misleading the public about the sustainability of recycling, noting that these companies have consistently resisted efforts to limit production.

AEPW’s Defense and Industry Pushback

In response to criticism, the AEPW defended its efforts, stating that it is investing in scalable innovations to address plastic waste. However, the alliance has drawn scrutiny for lobbying against measures to limit plastic production during United Nations negotiations for a global plastic treaty.

While the AEPW argues that production caps are unnecessary, environmental organizations maintain that reducing plastic output is essential to combating the crisis. Tensions have risen as governments, including the UK under its Labour leadership, push for stricter limits on production.

Experts Highlight the Need for Reduced Production

Experts agree that reducing plastic production is crucial to addressing the pollution crisis. Professor Steve Fletcher of the University of Portsmouth’s Revolution Plastics Institute emphasized the importance of curbing virgin plastic production. Without tackling overproduction, recycling and waste diversion efforts will have minimal impact.

The AEPW’s focus on chemical recycling and long-term solutions, critics argue, fails to address the root problem: excessive production of new plastic.

Global Plastic Production Continues to Surge

Global plastic production more than doubled between 2000 and 2019, reaching 460 million tons annually by 2019. According to the OECD, only 9% of that plastic was recycled, highlighting the vast scale of the problem. Despite initiatives like the AEPW, experts caution that these efforts will remain insufficient unless production is significantly reduced.

The Path Forward: Reduction or Recycling?

As the United Nations’ global plastic treaty talks near their conclusion, the debate over capping plastic production intensifies. While the AEPW argues against caps, many environmental groups and governments insist that limiting production is critical to solving the crisis.

The coming months will reveal whether the industry will shift its focus toward reducing production or continue relying on recycling efforts that fail to address the core issue. The outcome of these discussions will determine the trajectory of global plastic pollution and the strategies needed to mitigate its impact.

Join the Discussion

What are your thoughts on the plastic pollution crisis? Should the industry prioritize reducing plastic production or improving recycling initiatives? Share your perspective in the comments below!