Prime Minister Faces Accusations Amid Government-Judiciary Clash
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is under investigation for her role in the release of a Libyan official accused of torture. Justice Minister Carlo Nordio, Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi, and Undersecretary Alfredo Mantovano are also involved in the inquiry. The Rome prosecutor’s office launched the case, intensifying tensions between the government and the judiciary.
Meloni personally announced the investigation in a video shared on social media. Her tone shifted between defiance and amusement. “The news today is this: Rome’s Chief Prosecutor, Francesco Lo Voi—the same man who failed to convict Matteo Salvini—has informed me that I am under investigation for aiding and abetting and embezzlement,” she stated. She suggested that some oppose the changes she is implementing in Italy but insisted she would not back down. “I will not be blackmailed or intimidated. I will continue with my head held high and without fear,” she declared.
Controversial Deportation of a Libyan Official
The investigation centers on Najeem Osama Almasri, a high-ranking Libyan police official. Italian authorities arrested him in Turin on January 19 under an International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant. However, just three days later, he boarded an Italian Air Force Falcon jet back to Libya, with taxpayers covering the cost.
Almasri faces allegations of running a torture camp for migrants. Despite the charges, Justice Minister Carlo Nordio did not approve the arrest. Without that approval, the judge had no choice but to order his release. Opposition leaders condemned this as a “luxury repatriation” and suspect a secret deal with Libya.
Meloni’s government relies on Libya to block migrant departures. Human rights groups criticize Libya’s treatment of migrants, but Italy continues cooperating. Critics argue that Meloni prioritized diplomatic ties over justice by ignoring the ICC warrant and sending Almasri home. The opposition claims she sacrificed international law to maintain good relations with Tripoli.
Judicial Independence or Political Targeting?
The case adds fuel to an ongoing power struggle between Meloni’s government and the judiciary. Her proposed judicial reforms aim to limit prosecutorial independence. Many judges and legal professionals argue these changes violate democratic principles. Some believe the investigation is retaliation from the judiciary.
Italy’s judiciary operates independently from Parliament and the government. Prosecutors can pursue cases against politicians without restrictions. This autonomy has helped fight corruption and organized crime. However, critics say some prosecutors use legal cases for political purposes.
The newspaper La Stampa noted that seven of the last twelve Italian prime ministers faced criminal investigations. Only Silvio Berlusconi received a conviction. Statistically, Meloni might not need to worry, but the case highlights ongoing tensions between Italy’s political and judicial institutions.
This investigation raises key questions about power and accountability in Italy. Did Meloni’s government make a political decision that ignored international law? Or is this inquiry part of a broader fight between the government and an independent judiciary? The debate continues.