Intel is facing significant challenges as it navigates the competitive semiconductor industry. The company, which has been the backbone of U.S. chip manufacturing, is at a critical point, with declining stock values, recent removals from major stock indices, and escalating competition from companies like Nvidia, Qualcomm, and AMD.
In recent years, Intel has struggled to keep up with the latest chip nodes, especially as competitors like Taiwan-based TSMC have dominated cutting-edge chip production. Despite these setbacks, Intel’s next-generation 18A process technology could be pivotal for its comeback. With Amazon already on board as a customer, Intel hopes to prove that it can deliver advanced, efficient, and reliable manufacturing. However, the company has yet to win broader support from other tech giants that still favor established foundries like TSMC.
To address these challenges, Intel plans to separate its chip manufacturing and design divisions, creating a new entity called Intel Foundry. This move is intended to attract external clients by allowing the foundry business to operate independently. If successful, Intel Foundry could be valued at around $80 billion. However, the foundry will need other major clients beyond Amazon to achieve the necessary scale. Intel has also been trimming costs through layoffs and real estate sales to stabilize financially amid increased capital expenditures.
The U.S. government views Intel as a strategic asset in the race for technological dominance, especially in AI and semiconductor independence. Intel is set to receive funding from the CHIPS Act to strengthen its domestic manufacturing capabilities, although this funding has not yet been allocated. Under Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, government officials have pushed for other U.S.-based tech companies to buy more chips from Intel to support its role in the American tech landscape.
However, the company’s fate remains uncertain. If Intel fails to regain momentum in manufacturing or the market response to its foundry division lags, it may be forced to consider a merger or acquisition. This has led to discussions of contingency plans among U.S. policymakers, who are keen to support Intel but may consider alternatives if it cannot meet its objectives.