24

Denmark has publicly rejected the Trump administration’s recent criticism of its Arctic defense strategy, highlighting tensions between the two countries over military presence in Greenland. The criticism came shortly after U.S. Vice President JD Vance’s visit to Greenland, where he voiced concerns about Denmark’s defense commitments on the island.

Denmark Responds to U.S. Criticism

Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen wasted no time in addressing the accusations, taking to social media to condemn the tone used by U.S. officials. In a video response, Rasmussen stated, “We welcome criticism, but not this tone. That’s not how allies speak to each other.” His comments underscore the diplomatic strain between Denmark and the U.S., particularly in relation to the Arctic defense issues.

Rasmussen reaffirmed Denmark’s commitment to its strong relationship with the U.S., emphasizing that the country remains a steadfast ally in NATO and other defense agreements. However, he also made it clear that the tone of the U.S. criticism was not acceptable, particularly as both nations share strategic and military interests in the Arctic region.

Historic U.S.-Denmark Defense Agreement

Rasmussen further highlighted the historical context of Denmark’s defense relationship with the U.S., referencing the 1951 defense agreement between the two countries. This agreement, which allows the U.S. to have a military presence in Greenland, has been the cornerstone of the countries’ defense ties in the Arctic.

The Foreign Minister reminded his audience that the agreement explicitly permits the U.S. to maintain a military presence on the island, including the Pituffik Space Base. This facility remains the only major U.S. installation in Greenland, and it serves as a critical asset for American operations in the Arctic and beyond. Rasmussen suggested that if the U.S. seeks to expand its military presence in Greenland, it should open a dialogue with Denmark to discuss the matter, rather than resorting to criticism.

Denmark’s Recent Investments in Arctic Security

In response to the U.S. criticism, Rasmussen also pointed to Denmark’s recent efforts to bolster its Arctic defense capabilities. In January, the Danish government committed a significant sum of 14.6 billion kroner (approximately €1.9 billion) to improve its security posture in the Arctic. The funding will be used to develop three new naval vessels, long-range drones, and advanced surveillance satellites.

Rasmussen emphasized that Denmark takes Arctic security seriously and is continually investing in strengthening its defense infrastructure. He noted that Denmark’s military presence in Greenland has always been balanced and focused on securing the region, but that it will continue to evolve as new security challenges emerge in the Arctic.

Vice President Vance’s Accusations

Vice President JD Vance’s visit to Greenland on Friday had a more critical tone. Speaking to U.S. troops stationed at the Pituffik Space Base, Vance accused Denmark of failing to adequately invest in Greenland’s defense. He stated, “You have not done a good job by the people of Greenland.” Vance suggested that Denmark’s lack of sufficient investment in the region left the island vulnerable and that the U.S. must play a more prominent role in ensuring Greenland’s security.

Vance also proposed that Greenland would benefit economically and militarily from closer ties with the United States. He encouraged the territory to consider moving toward independence from Denmark, claiming that it would thrive with the support of the U.S. “They’d fare better economically with U.S. support,” Vance said, also hinting at a future partnership between Greenland and the U.S. that could extend beyond military cooperation to economic and geopolitical matters.

Greenlanders and Danes Reject U.S. Pressure

Vance’s remarks sparked significant backlash in both Greenland and Denmark. Greenland’s lawmakers and citizens quickly criticized the tone and content of the U.S. visit. Many voiced their displeasure at what they saw as undue U.S. pressure on the territory. Local leaders were especially upset by the fact that Washington did not consult them before planning the visit.

Greenland’s government firmly rejected any suggestions that the U.S. should have a larger role in the region or that the island should seek independence from Denmark. The backlash was so strong that it forced the U.S. delegation to scale back its planned activities in Greenland, signaling the negative impact of Vance’s comments on diplomatic relations.

Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen Defends Denmark

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen also responded to Vance’s accusations, defending her country’s commitment to Arctic defense. In a statement, she called Denmark “a good and strong ally” in securing the Arctic region. Frederiksen strongly rejected claims of underinvestment, emphasizing that Denmark has continuously contributed to Arctic defense in line with its strategic interests.

She reiterated that Denmark would continue to work closely with the U.S. on Arctic security, but she also made it clear that Denmark would not tolerate the kind of criticism that undermined its role as a NATO ally. Frederiksen’s comments reinforced Denmark’s determination to maintain its sovereignty over Greenland while cooperating with international allies on security matters.

Protests Erupt in Copenhagen

The growing frustration with U.S. pressure on Denmark and Greenland boiled over into protests in Copenhagen. On Saturday, hundreds of demonstrators gathered outside the U.S. Embassy, denouncing the U.S. stance on Greenland’s future. Some protesters held signs that read “Back off, USA,” while others voiced their concerns about Trump’s repeated threats to annex Greenland during his presidency.

The protests reflect a larger trend of resistance to U.S. rhetoric across Denmark, particularly regarding the future of Greenland. Many Danes and Greenlanders feel that the U.S. has overstepped its bounds in trying to influence the territory’s political and military decisions. The demonstrations serve as a reminder that while the U.S. may be a key ally, its attempts to assert greater control over Greenland are not well-received by the local population.

Looking Ahead: A Test for U.S.-Denmark Relations

The recent exchange between the U.S. and Denmark marks a critical juncture in Arctic geopolitics. Denmark’s defense strategy and its relationship with the U.S. are coming under increasing scrutiny, especially as both countries navigate the changing dynamics of global security. As the Arctic becomes more strategically important due to climate change and growing geopolitical tensions, Denmark’s role in the region will continue to evolve.