Rudolph Angler Ben & Jerry’s has amended its lawsuit against its parent company, Unilever, accusing the multinational corporation of blocking its social activism initiatives.
Dispute Over Social Media Post Referencing Trump
The ice cream company claims Unilever’s ice cream division president, Peter ter Kulve, stopped a social media post that referenced Donald Trump. The post aimed to address critical social issues, including abortion, climate change, minimum wages, and universal healthcare. The lawsuit argues that ter Kulve deemed criticizing Trump as “too taboo,” despite Ben & Jerry’s longstanding history of progressive activism and challenges to Trump’s policies. This decision, the company contends, undermines its core values, which it upholds with its motto: “Peace, Love, and Ice Cream.”
Accusations of Suppressing Statements on Palestine
Ben & Jerry’s also accuses Unilever of silencing its statements in support of Palestinian refugees and its call to end military aid to Israel. According to the lawsuit, Unilever allegedly threatened to dismantle Ben & Jerry’s board and pursue legal action against board members to prevent such statements from being released. Tensions escalated after Ben & Jerry’s halted sales in occupied Palestinian territories in 2021, citing its commitment to human rights, which was at odds with operating in these areas.
Ben & Jerry’s Stands Firm on Social Justice Mission
The amended lawsuit argues that Unilever has repeatedly obstructed Ben & Jerry’s efforts to promote peace and human rights, despite a contractual agreement that affirms the ice cream company’s independent board’s oversight over its social mission. Ben & Jerry’s maintains its commitment to progressive values and promises to continue advocating for justice and human rights, insisting that corporate control cannot diminish its dedication to activism.